|
|
|
| The
death penalty is applied fairly and may be used. |
 |
 |
Discretion has always been an essential part of our system of justice. No
one expects the prosecutor to pursue every possible offense or punishment,
nor do we expect the same sentence to be imposed just because two crimes
appear similar. Each crime is unique, both because the circumstances of
each victim are different and because each defendant is different. The U.S.
Supreme Court has held that a mandatory death penalty which applied to everyone
convicted of first degree murder would be unconstitutional. Hence, we must
give prosecutors and juries some discretion.
In fact, more white people are executed in this country
than black people. And even if blacks are disproportionately represented
on death row, proportionately blacks commit more murders than whites.
Moreover, the Supreme Court has rejected the use of statistical studies
which claim racial bias as the sole reason for overturning a death sentence.
Even if the death penalty punishes some while sparing
others, it does not follow that everyone should be spared. The guilty
should still be punished appropriately, even if some do escape proper
punishment unfairly. The death penalty should apply to killers of black
people as well as to killers of whites. High paid, skillful lawyers should
not be able to get some defendants off on technicalities. The existence
of some systemic problems is no reason to abandon the whole death penalty
system.
|
|